Why am I writing in opposition to Obama instead of writing in support of McCain?
Quite simply, McCain is a known entity. There's lots of reasons not to like him, and they're all scattered about the public record for all to see. The guy is pretty much WYSIWYG. It's a waste of time to write about him. But Obama is a mystery, an invented fantasy character. He has no virtually no public record and in fact has never held a job other than a few years as Senator (state and federal). The fascination with him is astonishing to me.
Moreover, I'm a contrarian. I don't just get in line with the popular people to do the popular things because they're popular. And when I see people going along with the popular things, I get suspicious. Sometimes, in the case of Apple fans, the popular people are snotty pricks, but they're right. Other times, as with the Ridiculously Large SUV craze, people are just plain dumb.
Thus the series on Obama.
This installment is about judgment. One of the Obama campaign's top selling points is judgment, probably because they know they're screwed on experience. We're supposed to believe that Obama's track record of making sound judgments is a key differentiator in his favor.
But is it?
Recent Comments