Archives

Recent Comments

Popular Threads

« Merry Christmas from Cuz We Said So | Main | “California has no room for good Samaritans” »

December 25, 2008

Drug Treatments: Which Should We Pay For?

Ann Althouse: “We spend $20 billion a year on drug and alcohol treatment programs -- without demanding much of any evidence that they work.”  She’s referencing this NYT article, which does not paint a pretty picture.

Unfortunately, while I’m sympathetic to the thrust of the article—in general I think any expenditure of public funds—really, any collection of public funds—should be contingent on good evidence that the money will accomplish what policy makers propose it will.  If some treatments work, and some don’t work, or work less well, I think we should be concentrating our money on what works.  This seems like common sense.  Unfortunately, I will be surprised if we see this change any time soon.  Change would require a simultaneous shift in attitude toward greater accountability among three decentralized communities—voters, politicians, and drug counselors—who appear to have little incentive to change.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c56cb53ef01053694d84e970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Drug Treatments: Which Should We Pay For?:

Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus

Like Us on Facebook

David on Twitter

Rip on Twitter

Russell on Twitter

Top Commenters

Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 05/2004