October 24, 2004

Kerry and the Security Council Meeting

I didn't hear this, because I skipped the debates... but apparently, Senator Kerry cited his meeting with the UN Security Council as an example of how he is more tuned in to international reactions to Iraq than is the president? He apparently mentioned the same meeting before the Council on Foreign Relations in New York in December last year.

That makes this story rather interesting:

U.N. ambassadors from several nations are disputing assertions by Democratic presidential candidate Sen. John Kerry that he met for hours with all members of the U.N. Security Council just a week before voting in October 2002 to authorize the use of force in Iraq.

An investigation by The Washington Times reveals that while the candidate did talk for an unspecified period to at least a few members of the panel, no such meeting, as described by Mr. Kerry on a number of occasions over the past year, ever occurred.

...of the five ambassadors on the Security Council in 2002 who were reached directly for comment, four said they had never met Mr. Kerry. The four also said that no one who worked for their countries' U.N. missions had met with Mr. Kerry either.

The former ambassadors who said on the record they had never met Mr. Kerry included the representatives of Mexico, Colombia and Bulgaria. The ambassador of a fourth country gave a similar account on the condition that his country not be identified.

...Asked whether the international body had any records of Mr. Kerry sitting down with the whole council, a U.N. spokesman said that "our office does not have any record of this meeting."

Huh. What to make of this?

Thanks to Power Line for the pointer.

Posted by David Gaw in Current Affairs & Politics at October 24, 2004 11:04 PM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://cuzwesaidso.com/cgi-bin/movabletype/mt-tb.cgi/847

Comments

Kerry lied! No Blood for Ketchup!

Posted by: Rip Rowan [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 25, 2004 12:24 AM